VSLive lucked out when the hurricane diverted and missed Orlando. Now PASS, in Orlando next week, is dealing with Hurricane Jeanne. Watch PASS track chair Roman Rehak’s blog for updates. The SQLPass site also has information and links regarding the Hurricane.

There is an AP article that has been picked up by a lot of papers around the world and I’ll link to it on msnbc’s site. The article is about using quantum physics for encryption via photons (light particles) – rather than the keys (strings of random numbers) we use today. It’s pretty far out but not even totally new. There are a few companies already offering solutions (eg MagiQ Technologies) and Harvard is working on the availability on the web. Pretty amazing stuff. I guess in __ years from now, it will be as common as sliced bread.

I love doing this! I have to refactor some pieces of a big production application for a client. This also means stripping some functionality of the application and turning it into individual components which I have wanted to do, but could not justify billing my client for. But now I must do this in order to incorporate some new functionality that will also need access to this logic. Sometimes, working with “old code” is a huge bore, but this is fun because I’m making my code smarter and that makes me feel a little smarter.

When I first started looking at .NET, one of the new concepts that I kept running into was the “delegate” thingies. I kept seeing things written about them, but never walked away really understanding what they were. So it becamse my mission and the first time I really had a “DING!” go off in my head was an explanation in The Book of VB.NET by Matthew MacDonald. Unfortunately, I have long since passed this book on to someone in the user group so I can’t quote it.

Anyway, I thought of this because Avonelle mentioned delegates and the difficulty that she has had getting her head around them and pointed to this article on KnowdotNET that gave her the “aha!” moment.

I actually had a more interesting realization about delegates this summer at TechEd when I was doing a TabletPC Hands on Lab that was all in C#. I couldn’t understand why I had to keep writing so many delegates and then I realized that the delegates were creating event handlers! And THIS is why us VB background people have such a hard time grokking delegates. IN VB (past and .NET), event handlers come free. They are already there. If you drop a control onto a page, then you automatically have access to that controls list of events in your code. If you instantiate a class in your code, the class’s events are available in the dropdown. So we never had to use delegates (not even available to use before .NET anyway) and therefore they didn’t come naturally.

So you C++ and C# developers, next time your walking down the street and you see someone who is scratching their head muttering “delegates…I just don’t get it”, and you are kind enough to attempt to explain and they STILL don’t get it, don’t just shake your head and walk away. You need to relate them to something that already IS in VB so that they have a bridge. Event Handlers are that bridge.

update with just a little more goo: Just an FYI for you VB’ers. I’m working on converting a login form from VB to C# …oh the drudgery of solving casing problems! 🙂  Anyway, I thought I would point out that when you double click on a control to get it’s default event, C# automatically codes up the delegate in the InitializeComponent method. So I clicked on an OK button and not only did I get my event code but it’s delegate was auto generated as well (that’s backwards – because the delegate makes the event handler possible)
  this.btnOK.Click += new System.EventHandler(this.btnOK_Click);

So if you just consider the relationship between this delegate and the familiar event handler

it might help a bit…

…and recruiters? Well, yes, actually.

I was reading this post of Casey Chesnut’s where he is ranting about some of the annoying things recruiters do and says :

that disconnect being recruiters. you’ve got a high tech company on one end, then you’ve got technical workers on the other … and smack in the middle, somebody that does not know technology

I couldn’t help but think immediately of one of the SSL issues that is avoided with WS-Security. Things are secure when they are in the SSL pipe, but if you have an intermediary en route, your message has to exit the pipe and you can’t be sure that the intermediary is secure. With WS-Security, you *do* have end to end security as the sender and receiver are the only ones who can interpret the message.

So I had to laugh when Casey made that statement, because I just couldn’t help thinking of the somewhat skewed analogy!