Entity Framework/WCF Data Services June 2011 CTP: Derived Entities with Related Data

Well, this change really came in the March 2011 CTP but I didn’t realize it until the June CTP was out, so I’ll call it a wash.

WCF Data Services has had a bad problem with inherited types where the derived type had a relationship to yet another type. For example, in this model where TPTTableA is a derived type (from Base)and has related data (BaseChildren).



If you expose just the Bases EntitySet (along with its derived type) in a WCF Data service, that was fine. I can browse to http://localhost:3958/WcfDataService1.svc/Bases easily.

But if I also exposed the related type (BaseChild) then the data service would have a hissy fit when you tried to access the hierarchy base (same URI as before). If you dig into the error it tells you:

“Navigation Properties are not supported on derived entity types. Entity Set ‘Bases’ has a instance of type ‘cf_model.ContextModel.TPTTableA’, which is an derived entity type and has navigation properties. Please remove all the navigation properties from type ‘cf_model.ContextModel.TPTTableA’”

Paul Mehner blogged about this and I wrote up a request on Microsoft Connect. Here’s Paul’s post: Windows Communication Foundation Data Services (Astoria) – The Stuff They Should Have Told You Before You Started

But it’s now fixed!

Using the same model, I can expose all of the entity sets in the data service and I’m still able to access the types in the inheritance hierarchy.

Here is an example where I am looking at a single Base entity and in fact this happens to be one of the derived types, notice in the category the term is cf_model.TPTA. The type is strongly typed.


You can see that strong typing in the link to the related data:


That’s how the data service is able to see the relationship, only off of the specific type that owns the relationship.

So accessing the relationship is a little different than normal. I struggled with this but was grateful for some help from data wizard, Pablo Castro.

The Uri to access the navigation requires that type specification:


You also need that type if you want to eager load the type along with it’s related data:


Note that I was still having a little trouble with the navigation (the first of these two Uris). It turns out that cassini (i.e. the asp.net Web Development Server) was having a problem with the period (.) in between cf_model and TPTA.

Once I switched the service to use IIS Express (which was my first time using IIS Express and shockingly easy!), it was fine. (Thanks again to Pablo for setting me straight on this problem.)

So it’s come a long way and if this is how it is finalized, I can live with it though I guess it would be nice to have the URIs cleaned up.

Of course you’re more likely to use one of the client libraries that hide much of the Uri writing from us, so maybe in the end it will not be so bad. I have not yet played with the new client library that came with this CTP so I can’t say quite yet.

  Sign up for my newsletter so you don't miss my conference & Pluralsight course announcements!  

5 thoughts on “Entity Framework/WCF Data Services June 2011 CTP: Derived Entities with Related Data

  1. Has anybody else that has insalled the June 2011 CTP and is using the t4 templates had any success? Now that I have installed the CTP my t4 templates are no longer generating the context class. My context class file simply has the message "No EntityContainer exists in the model, so no code was generated". I’m not sure if I need to modify the context.tt in anyway to get my context class to generate.

    Many Thanks,


  2. Hi,

    I tried to install a ASP.Net hosted WCF Data Service (build targeting the CTP – v4.2) in IIS 7.5 without success.

    My App needs v4.2, and IIS has only v4.0 available.

    Any help will be highly appreciated.



  3. Sorry to bug you Julie, but do you happen to have a sample June CTP code-first solution with enums? I can’t get enum model properties to show up in the database.

    I already posted on the forums, no luck 🙁

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.